Can facts correct your isms? Or do isms correct your facts? We all have particular beliefs. Some of them we hold onto without even noticing them. The philosopher Charles Taylor called these our “unthoughts.” These are what we think without reflection, often without confirmation. J. Warner Wallace, a famous cold case detective, says we ought to seek facts, not evidence. Evidence so often helps us rationalize our unthoughts. But most of us want evidence, not pesky facts that could challenge us. Few people, in fact, step outside of what society generally allows them to believe.
So, for example, society tells us that religion is alright if we find our own personal meaning in it. Most people only think of meaning as a property of their minds. Meaning is just in our heads, not out there in the real world. But it’s not generally understood today that a religion could actually be true, even historically verifiable. Since religion is something we simply make meaning of, it cannot have the ability to change our lifestyles much. We don’t need to take up our crosses and follow a real Jesus very much. Thus we can go to church on Sundays and live mostly for ourselves the rest of the week. It goes without saying, though perhaps I need to say it, that this depiction is at odds with historical and orthodox Christianity. I also think the idea of making your own meaning is incoherent, but that’s another story.
Another example of “unthought” is our preoccupation with race, class, and gender. Many of our assumptions about this modern trinity go completely unchallenged. We are told there is systemic racism and instead of researching what that means and looking for facts to support it or deny it, we simply accept it. For white people it is good virtue-signalling to accept it because if you don’t, you are considered racist. Sure there is still individual racism, which is very unfortunate, but systemic racism? How do we define that? We have so much “white guilt” (as the much ridiculed black conservative author Shelby Steele points out) that we’re afraid to look into it. But when we boil it down, it is very hard to substantiate systemic racism as existent today. As far as class goes, we are told that when the rich get richer, the poor get poorer, as if economics were a zero sum game. One reading of Thomas Sowell’s Economic Facts and Fallacy would blow this view to smithereens, but that takes away from watching our favorite TV shows. With gender, we are told that it is simply a social construct with no biological meaning. If you examine these concepts, you will find out very quickly that all this is based on extremely muddled thinking rather than facts, research, stats and so on. But again, most of us feel our way through life, keeping ourselves busy with constant amusement, unaware that “a-muse” means to not think. We don’t think while we slowly walk onward towards our mortal end with nothing substantial to truly follow, leaving life half-lived and truth half-sought.
And we wonder why people are so sensitive today. Well, if your worldview is completely subjective, not based on facts at all, and I challenge it, how are you going to react? You’re going to react like Arnold Schwarzenegger in the movie “Jingle All the Way,” with total panic. “Put that cookie [fact] down! Now!” Or perhaps you’ll be more like one of Jim Jones or Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh’s cult followers. You’ll just smile, knowing that you know the truth because…well…you just feel it.